Independent Women's Forum RSS feedhttp://www.iwf.orgThe RSS feed for the IWF. News, Commentary and Blog posts from the Independent Women's Foundation.(...)IWF RSShttp://iwf.org/images/email-logo.pnghttp://www.iwf.org33968Time: Trump President-Elect of "Divided States Of America"http://iwf.org/media/2802324/Sabrina SchaefferWed, 7 Dec 2016 08:12:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumMedia Focus On Wealth Of Pres-Elect Trump's Cabinet Picks • Forbes On Foxhttp://iwf.org/media/2802302/Sabrina SchaefferSat, 3 Dec 2016 10:12:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumReport: $108B In Student Loan Debt To Be "Forgiven" • Forbes On Foxhttp://iwf.org/media/2802301/Sabrina SchaefferSat, 3 Dec 2016 10:12:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumAre Democrats Out Of Touch? • Coast To Coasthttp://iwf.org/media/2802282/Sabrina SchaefferFri, 2 Dec 2016 12:12:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumSolving Conflict Of Interests Comes With Reigning In Government • Forbes On Foxhttp://iwf.org/media/2802304/Sabrina SchaefferFri, 2 Dec 2016 10:12:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumHow Will The New Administration Cut The Federal Budget? • Forbes On Fox http://iwf.org/media/2802226/Sabrina SchaefferSat, 26 Nov 2016 11:11:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumWill Trump Dismantle Iran Nuclear Deal? • Forbes On Foxhttp://iwf.org/media/2802225/Sabrina SchaefferSat, 26 Nov 2016 11:11:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumNew Push To Simplify Federal Tax Code • Forbes On Foxhttp://iwf.org/media/2802224/Sabrina SchaefferSat, 26 Nov 2016 11:11:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumFed Expected To Raise Rates Next Month: Are They Too Powerful? • Forbes On Foxhttp://iwf.org/media/2802177/Sabrina SchaefferSat, 19 Nov 2016 08:11:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumWill Trump's Infrastructure Plan Include Rolling Back Regulations? • Forbes On Foxhttp://iwf.org/media/2802176/Sabrina SchaefferSat, 19 Nov 2016 08:11:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumAmericans Voted Against Progressive Policies in 2016 • Coast To Coasthttp://iwf.org/media/2802178/Sabrina SchaefferFri, 18 Nov 2016 09:11:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumWhy We Can Applaud Women's Success Every Day -- Not Just Election Day<p> There&rsquo;s a lot of excitement today over the possibility of electing the first female president. While my policy preferences differ significantly from Hillary Clinton&rsquo;s, I can relate to friends and family who view this as a significant milestone. It is &ndash; and not just for women. It suggests that as a country we have made tremendous strides in the quest for equal rights and equal opportunity, and that&rsquo;s something that both Republicans and Democrats can applaud.</p> <p> But whether or not one supports or votes for Clinton, it&rsquo;s helpful to keep in mind the positive message we can share with our sons and daughters every day &ndash; not just Election Day.</p> <p> I&rsquo;m grateful that one doesn&rsquo;t have to support Clinton to support women&rsquo;s progress, and I&rsquo;m thrilled that we live at a time where my children have an endless list of female role models to look up to. My daughters and son have to look no further than their own grandmothers, both of whom worked as partners with their husbands to build and manage successful businesses. They know women who have traveled the world. Women who are lawyers, doctors, judges, writers, and artists. They know women who are amazing teachers, chefs, and musicians. Findley recently met a female Olympic fencer; Penelope has a friend whose mom is a genetic researcher. They know women in government and public policy. Women in real estate and industry. Women in the media and women pursuing their PhDs. They also know women who have embraced their roles as mothers, and who love it, and who ought to be recognized for their dedication and hard work. They know women who are Republicans and women who are Democrats. And everyday they see women who have carved out different work-life arrangements that work for them &ndash; and that&rsquo;s a true gift.</p> <p> So whoever wins the presidential election we ought to remember -- and share with our daughters and sons -- that women have an unprecedented opportunity to learn, to work, and to pursue their own vision of happiness in America &ndash; and that&rsquo;s what Election Day is really all about.</p> http://iwf.org/blog/2802016/Sabrina SchaefferTue, 8 Nov 2016 15:11:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumWhy Child-Care Preferences Of Parents--Not Politicians--Should Prevail<p> In an atypical election it&rsquo;s not surprising voters are hearing about atypical policy issues. And this year both candidates have been spending more time than usual talking about accessing affordable, quality child care.</p> <p> While the issue of child care doesn&rsquo;t often come up on polls, &ldquo;the economy,&rdquo; consistently ranks as voters leading concern. And when researchers dig down into what about the economy, respondents point to jobs, income inequality, and rising prices. &ldquo;The economy&rdquo; is a catch-all term for how people feel they&rsquo;re doing &ndash; it&rsquo;s a reflection of affordability and opportunity for upward mobility. And for families, child care is a major part of that equation.</p> <p> American households today look starkly different from generations past. While in 1975 more than half of children were cared for by a full-time, stay-at-home parent, today that number is less than one-third. What&rsquo;s more, the Pew Research Center recently found that only 23 percent of working mothers would <em>choose</em> to work full-time if they had the choice. This is not to say that women don&rsquo;t enjoy or want exciting careers outside of the home &ndash; many of course do &ndash; but it reminds us that plenty of women aren&rsquo;t working to satisfy an intellectual itch, but to pay the bills. And many families today require two incomes, meaning child care isn&rsquo;t a luxury &ndash; it&rsquo;s a necessity.</p> <p> When lawmakers (especially progressive politicians like Hillary Clinton) talk about how to help working families better afford quality child care, however, they focus almost entirely on helping pay for institutional daycare facilities. There have been proposals to infuse daycare centers with more funds so (in theory) families would have to pay less &ndash; but we&rsquo;ve seen how &ldquo;well&rdquo; that works with college tuition subsidies. And there have been calls for mandates to provide on-site daycare at businesses &ndash; certainly a regulatory nightmare for businesses and overlooks that many parents would prefer a different child-care arrangement.</p> <p> These government interventions would distort the child-care marketplace, drive up costs, limit choices, and place undue burdens on businesses. What&rsquo;s more they won&rsquo;t actually help a whole lot of working families who don&rsquo;t&mdash;and don&rsquo;t want to&mdash;rely on formal daycare arrangements. In fact, fewer than 25 percent of families with young children currently use an organized daycare facility. Many families still make financial sacrifices to keep one parent at home, and others rely on a grandparent or another family member to help out.</p> <p> <iframe allowfullscreen="" frameborder="0" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/shnWTs6AK5U" width="560"></iframe></p> <p> And there&rsquo;s a good reason why so many families prefer to have loved ones look after their young children rather than using paid daycare. As <a href="http://www.nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-uncomfortable-truth-about-daycare">IWF&rsquo;s Carrie Lukas has written</a>, research suggests that daycare is far from &ldquo;neutral&rdquo; &ndash; that there are certainly negative impacts to consider. That&rsquo;s why when we are crafting legislation, it is worth considering the value of family members who forgo pay to care for children and the elderly. And we ought to do more to consider how government can ease the financial burden for these families, too.</p> <p> Washington can help working families by consolidating existing child-care spending and credits and returning those resources to families so they can make the decisions that work best for them, whether that&rsquo;s a daycare center or a grandparent. By returning funds to families we would eliminate the government bias against stay-at-home parents, while streamlining government programs, and simplifying the tax code.</p> <p> What&rsquo;s more, states have the opportunity to rollback burdensome regulations that don&rsquo;t actually impact quality of care. Caretaker-child ratios and group sizes, for instance, sound nice, but are often costly to implement and studies suggest fail to improve the quality of care received by children. Better to free up daycare providers to invest in areas they see as most necessary, such as fewer, better trained professionals.</p> <p> And lawmakers can make it easier for families to save for early and lifetime education by expanding tax-preferred accounts like 529s, which nearly 11 million Americans already take advantage of for higher education savings. (<a href="http://www.workingforwomenreport.com/">See more on all of this in IWF&rsquo;s Working for Women report</a>.)</p> <p> The good news is that Americans are very much open to a shift in policy &ndash; and one that puts more ownership and control in the hands of families. In fact, in a <a href="http://pdf.iwf.org/IWF-Childcare%20Report.pdf">randomized controlled messaging trial that the Independent Women&rsquo;s Forum recently conducted with Evolving Strategies</a> we discovered that without any additional information respondents were overwhelmingly supportive of child-care tax credits and deductions (70 percent). And when respondents learned about how burdensome daycare center regulations drive up costs without improving quality, support for tax credits went even higher to almost 80 percent.</p> <p> <a href="http://s1202.photobucket.com/user/IWF11/media/IWF%20Projects/Screen%20Shot%202016-10-25%20at%2010.31.55%20PM_zpsbfsq85ed.png.html" target="_blank"><img alt=" photo Screen Shot 2016-10-25 at 10.31.55 PM_zpsbfsq85ed.png" border="0" src="http://i1202.photobucket.com/albums/bb366/IWF11/IWF%20Projects/Screen%20Shot%202016-10-25%20at%2010.31.55%20PM_zpsbfsq85ed.png" /></a></p> <p> Also significant is that Americans are skeptical about direct payouts to families (40 percent). More and more Americans understand that progressive policies that promise the moon often come with substantial tradeoffs. With just a small amount of information about some of the downsides of subsidizing daycare, support for less government spending increases by 12-points.</p> <p> <a href="http://s1202.photobucket.com/user/IWF11/media/IWF%20Projects/Screen%20Shot%202016-10-25%20at%2010.33.14%20PM_zpshvoor9sr.png.html" target="_blank"><img alt=" photo Screen Shot 2016-10-25 at 10.33.14 PM_zpshvoor9sr.png" border="0" src="http://i1202.photobucket.com/albums/bb366/IWF11/IWF%20Projects/Screen%20Shot%202016-10-25%20at%2010.33.14%20PM_zpshvoor9sr.png" /></a></p> <p> The bottom line is that politics is personal. Certainly &ldquo;the economy&rdquo; matters to people; but what <em>really</em> matters is what&rsquo;s buried in that word &ndash; finding affordable child-care solutions so that parents can comfortably leave young children when they need to go to work. All families aren&rsquo;t the same &ndash; and their child-care choices aren&rsquo;t going to be the same either. Americans want government to take a backseat and give families the resources and control over their child-care choices so they can make decisions that work best for their family.</p> <p> <em>Sabrina L. Schaeffer is executive director of the Independent Women&rsquo;s Forum, which just released a new video on childcare policies today.</em></p> http://iwf.org/news/2801888/Sabrina SchaefferWed, 26 Oct 2016 08:10:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumBill Clinton's Behavior Doesn't Reflect Well On Hillary • After The Bellhttp://iwf.org/media/2801821/Sabrina SchaefferWed, 19 Oct 2016 08:10:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's ForumAre Wikileaks E-mails Fair Game In Debate? • After The Bellhttp://iwf.org/media/2801820/Sabrina SchaefferWed, 19 Oct 2016 08:10:00 CSTen-usIndependent Women's Forum